home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!princeton!nextc.Princeton.EDU!mdd
- From: nextc.Princeton.EDU!mdd (Mark D. Doyle)
- Subject: Re: Length scales in physics
- Message-ID: <1992Aug23.014932.15108@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: nextc.princeton.edu
- Reply-To: mdd@nextc.princeton.edu
- Organization: Princeton University
- References: <Aug.22.21.05.34.1992.26084@ruhets.rutgers.edu>
- Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 01:49:32 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <Aug.22.21.05.34.1992.26084@ruhets.rutgers.edu>
- bweiner@ruhets.rutgers.edu (Benjamin Weiner) writes:
- > The earlier question of, more-or-less, "why do physicists assume that
- > all constants are less than 10?" is very interesting, because most of
- > the time when you calculate something the constants that emerge are
- > relatively small. Why? I don't know, and I don't think it can be
- > fully explained by psychological reasons that determine our units or
- > what quantities we choose to calculate. There's something there,
- > which explains why you just know, when Jackson says
- > show B = 96 pi NI/c (...)
- > that it will be a bitch and a half, because the constant is weird.
-
- Of course, there is always the constant 192 (pi)^3 that appears when you
- calculate the width of the muon. Dimensional analysis misses by 3 orders
- of magnitude. Useful to remember for qualifying exams.
-
- Mark
- mdd@nextc.princeton.edu
-