home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!zazen!doug.cae.wisc.edu!umn.edu!noc.msc.net!uc.msc.edu!shamash!ems!ems.cdc.com!mstemper
- From: mstemper@ems.cdc.com (Michael Stemper)
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Re: Fundamental Theorems?
- Message-ID: <19305@nntp_server.ems.cdc.com>
- Date: 13 Aug 92 17:02:07 GMT
- References: <4711@balrog.ctron.com>
- Sender: sys@ems.ems.cdc.com
- Reply-To: mstemper@ems.cdc.com
- Organization: Empros Systems International, a division of Ceridian
- Lines: 36
- Nntp-Posting-Host: kirk.ems.cdc.com
-
- In article <4711@balrog.ctron.com>, wilson@web.ctron.com writes:
- |> Fundamental Theorem of Geometry:
- |>
- |> The Independence of the Parallel Postulate:
- |>
- |> The parallel postulate is independent of the axioms of absolute
- |> geometry.
- |>
- |> Try to beat this one for historical importance as well as its
- |> bearing on mathematical thought.
-
- Important, yes. Accepted, yes. Theorem, no.
- How would you prove this? Reductio ad absurdum? :->
-
- |> Fundamental Theorem of Mathematics:
- |>
- |> The principle of mathematical induction:
- |>
- |> Let P(x) be a proposition about natural number x. If
- |> 1. P(0)
- |> 2. For all x, P(x) ==> P(x+1)
- |> Then P(x) is true for all numbers.
- |>
- |> This principle pervades mathematics. To understand, appreciate,
- |> and use mathematical induction is the entry ticket to mathematics.
- |>
- |> (Bob Silverman points out that mathematical induction is an
- |> axiom. I believe that this makes it no less a theorem).
-
- I thought that axioms were what you used to prove theorems?
-
- --
- #include <Standard_Disclaimer.h>
- Michael F. Stemper
- Power Systems Consultant
- mstemper@ems.cdc.com
-