home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!roundup.crhc.uiuc.edu!uicsl.csl.uiuc.edu!sarwate
- From: sarwate@uicsl.csl.uiuc.edu (Dilip V. Sarwate)
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Re: Littlewood's Three Principles
- Date: 12 Aug 1992 18:49:01 GMT
- Organization: Center for Reliable and High-Performance Computing, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Lines: 23
- Message-ID: <l8in8tINNnq3@roundup.crhc.uiuc.edu>
- References: <16bjm1INNesk@function.mps.ohio-state.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: uicsl.csl.uiuc.edu
-
- edgar@function.mps.ohio-state.edu (Gerald Edgar) writes:
-
- >Where do I find the original (published) formulation of Littlewood's
- >three principles, or at least a verbatum statement of them?
-
- In Section 3.6 of his book, Real Analysis (2nd ed., MacMillan, 1968),
- H. L. Royden gives a verbatim quotation from J. E. Littlewood's Lectures on
- the Theory of Functions (Oxford, 1944, p. 26)
-
- "The extent of knowledge required is nothing like so great as is sometimes
- supposed. There are three principles, roughly expressible in the following
- terms: Every (measurable) set is nearly a finite union of intervals; every
- [measurable] function is nearly continuous; every convergent sequence of
- [measurable] functions is nearly uniformly convergent. Most of the results
- of [the theory] are fairly intuitive applications of these ideas, and the
- student armed with them should be equal to most occasions when real variable
- theory is called for. If one of the principles would be the obvious means to
- settle the problem if it were `quite' true, it is natural to ask if the `nearly'
- is near enough, and for a problem that is actually solvable it generally is."
-
- I do not know how the passage actually reads in Littlewood's book, and have
- always assumed that the words in brackets and parentheses were inserted by
- Royden.
-