home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!concert!mcnc!theo!ekp
- From: ekp@mcnc.org (Edward Pavelchek)
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Subject: Re: Comparative Advantage
- Message-ID: <1992Aug21.211400.3851@mcnc.org>
- Date: 21 Aug 92 21:14:00 GMT
- References: <1992Aug20.155251.13201@gasco.com> <1992Aug21.034515.27965@csi.uottawa.ca>
- Sender: daemon@mcnc.org (David Daemon)
- Distribution: na
- Organization: Good place for a disclaimer
- Lines: 21
- Nntp-Posting-Host: alvin.mcnc.org
-
- I think Chris' article is right on the money. A poor economy puts most
- of its effort into sustenance. Improvements allow a fraction of the
- labor to be redirected - a lot went to clothing initially. Now, most of
- our current manufacturing is directed at housing and transportation.
-
- This does not mean that loss of manufacturing capability is trivial.
- On the other hand, it is vital that it remain strong. Countries without
- the ability to feed, clothe and house their population on the work of a
- small % of the labor force will not have the ability to support a large
- service sector. Since services are difficult to export, they cannot
- be expected to pay for food or manufactured goods imported.
-
- As the proportion of the economy in manufacturing grows smaller, it
- becomes more difficult to be sure how healthy it is. Our vast
- accumulated capital could be hiding manufacturing deficits painlessly
- for some time.
- --
- Ed Pavelchek ekp@mcnc.org
- But I make a profit of 3 1/4 cents an egg by selling them for 4 1/4
- cents an egg to the people in Malta I buy them from for 7 cents an egg.
- Of course, *I* don't make the profit. Joseph Heller, Catcha 22
-