home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pmafire!news.dell.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!news.bbn.com!noc.near.net!nic.umass.edu!dime!chelm.cs.umass.edu!yodaiken
- From: yodaiken@chelm.cs.umass.edu (victor yodaiken)
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Subject: Re: Empty Philosophies
- Message-ID: <51906@dime.cs.umass.edu>
- Date: 16 Aug 92 13:28:16 GMT
- References: <1992Aug12.223549.13128@gasco.com> <1992Aug15.021236.10452@news2.cis.umn.edu>
- Sender: news@dime.cs.umass.edu
- Distribution: na
- Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <1992Aug15.021236.10452@news2.cis.umn.edu> thomasc@bolyai.geom.umn.edu (Thomas Colthurst) writes:
- >Once again I feel personally summoned to point out the diversity of
- >Libertarian thought. Libertarian thought need not be more atomistic
- >than any other post-Enlightenment philosophy. Libertarianism is
- >tainted with materialism to the degree that we all are (if a taint
- >it be!). One can be a spiritual, or even Christian, Libertarian;
- >Novak (see his "The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism") has leanings
- >in this direction.
-
- Thus, "libertarian thought" is ranges from the absurd: "all evil
- comes from the government and all good comes from pure individualism",
- to the banal: "minimizing government intrusion into personal life
- is a worthy goal." And, in response to any critque of libertarian
- plank X, the libertarian may, with confidence, point to an array of
- equally silly libertarian positions which contradict X. Of course,
- the platform of the Libertarian Party is a little more difficult to
- finesse in this manner.
-
- --
-
-
- yodaiken@chelm.cs.umass.edu
-