home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!lth.se!pollux.lu.se!magnus
- From: magnus@thep.lu.se (Magnus Olsson)
- Subject: Re: tabulation of primes
- Message-ID: <1992Aug13.182916.10608@pollux.lu.se>
- Sender: news@pollux.lu.se (Owner of news files)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: dirac.thep.lu.se
- Organization: Theoretical Physics, Lund University, Sweden
- References: <1992Aug12.152948.39350@news.th-darmstadt.de> <1992Aug12.171656.8755@tessi.com> <1992Aug12.194603.23527@news.th-darmstadt.de>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 18:29:16 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <1992Aug12.194603.23527@news.th-darmstadt.de> graef@rs5.hrz.th-darmstadt.de (Ulrich Graef) writes:
- >In article <1992Aug12.171656.8755@tessi.com>, george@tessi.com (George Mitchell) writes:
- >> graef@rs5.hrz.th-darmstadt.de (Ulrich Graef) writes:
- >>
- >> >You must notice, that there exists a small community (even with
- >> >mathematicians among them) which does not believe in inductive
- >> >proofs. I think, they have a lot of problems with commonly
- >> >accepted theorems.
- >>
- >> Whoa! Euclid's proof does not involve induction! It is a
- >> reductio ad absurdum proof, ...
- >
- >You are right, but I only use the wrong words (english is not
- >my native language). There is also a group, which worries
- >about `reductio ad absurdum' proofs.
- >
- >A friend of mine worry about both!!!
-
- But Euclid's proof can easily be rewritten as a totally constructive
- proof, one that fulfils even the most stringent constructivist
- demands. Of course, then it's no longer a proof that there is an
- infinite number of primes (I suppose constructivists wouldn't accept
- such a statemnet as meaningful, anyway), but a proof that given any
- (finite) list of primes, one can always construct a prime not on the
- list.
-
- Magnus Olsson | \e+ /_
- Dept. of Theoretical Physics | \ Z / q
- University of Lund, Sweden | >----<
- Internet: magnus@thep.lu.se | / \===== g
- Bitnet: THEPMO@SELDC52 | /e- \q
-