home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!Sirius.dfn.de!math.fu-berlin.de!news.th-darmstadt.de!rs5.hrz.th-darmstadt.de!graef
- From: graef@rs5.hrz.th-darmstadt.de (Ulrich Graef)
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Subject: Re: tabulation of primes
- Message-ID: <1992Aug12.194603.23527@news.th-darmstadt.de>
- Date: 12 Aug 92 19:46:03 GMT
- References: <9208101729.AA24006@gandalf.ssw.com> <1557@anagld.analytics.com> <Bstqr2.Lxq@cs.columbia.edu> <1992Aug12.152948.39350@news.th-darmstadt.de> <1992Aug12.171656.8755@tessi.com>
- Sender: news@news.th-darmstadt.de (The Usenet-News System)
- Organization: TU Darmstadt
- Lines: 25
- Nntp-Posting-Host: rs5.hrz.th-darmstadt.de
-
- In article <1992Aug12.171656.8755@tessi.com>, george@tessi.com (George Mitchell) writes:
- > graef@rs5.hrz.th-darmstadt.de (Ulrich Graef) writes:
- >
- > >You must notice, that there exists a small community (even with
- > >mathematicians among them) which does not believe in inductive
- > >proofs. I think, they have a lot of problems with commonly
- > >accepted theorems.
- >
- > Whoa! Euclid's proof does not involve induction! It is a
- > reductio ad absurdum proof, ...
-
- You are right, but I only use the wrong words (english is not
- my native language). There is also a group, which worries
- about `reductio ad absurdum' proofs.
-
- A friend of mine worry about both!!!
-
- Uli
-
-
- --
- Ulrich Graef | analog (phone) : +49 6155 62493
- Lichtenbergweg 11 | digital (Email): graef@hrz.th-darmstadt.de
- D-W-6103 Griesheim +--------------------------------------------
- Germany | Nothing is real, look into your mirror!
-