home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!west.West.Sun.COM!smaug.West.Sun.COM!smaug.West.Sun.COM!news
- From: Richard.Mathews@West.Sun.COM (Richard M. Mathews)
- Newsgroups: sci.astro
- Subject: Re: Standard model of QSOsex
- Date: 17 Aug 1992 18:09:34 -0700
- Organization: Sunsoft Inc., Los Angeles, CA.
- Lines: 14
- Sender: richard@smaug.West.Sun.COM (Richard Mathews)
- Message-ID: <16pikeINNdf7@smaug.West.Sun.COM>
- References: <1992Aug3.151519.7995@vax.oxford.ac.uk> <BsqH8n.7M5@well.sf.ca.us> <1992Aug10.024159.18356@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca> <BsunH7.JMK@well.sf.ca.us>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: smaug.West.Sun.COM
-
- metares@well.sf.ca.us (Tom Van Flandern) writes:
- >Quasars are not, of course, *predicted* by the
- >standard model. They are just part of what it attempts to explain, ad hoc.
- > By contrast, quasars are predicted in the Meta Model
-
- Are you saying that the Meta Model was around 30 years ago before quasars
- redshifts were first measured? If not, how does your theory predict any
- more than does the standard model? Don't both take a base of physical
- principles and apply those to explain some observations?
-
- Richard M. Mathews Lietuva laisva = Free Lithuania
- Internet: richard@locus.com Brivu Latviju = Free Latvia
- UUCP: ...!uunet!lcc!richard Eesti vabaks = Free Estonia
- MIL/BITNET: richard%lcc@UUNET.UU.NET WE DID IT!!!
-