home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.writing
- Path: sparky!uunet!leafusa!hal
- From: hal@HQ.Ileaf.COM (Hal Wadleigh)
- Subject: Re: Publishing
- Message-ID: <1992Aug17.152753.666@HQ.Ileaf.COM>
- Summary: rave rejections
- Keywords: rejections raves
- Reply-To: hal@HQ.Ileaf.COM (Hal Wadleigh)
- Organization: Interleaf, Inc.
- References: <1992Aug12.123950.2112@exu.ericsson.se> <77765@ut-emx.uucp>
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 92 15:27:53 GMT
- Expires: 9/17/92
- Lines: 25
-
- The "accepted" term for the "love it but won't buy it" rejection is a
- "boquet of dead roses." Most publishers now have an absolute bar on
- first novels regardless of quality. They're making so much money on
- those sleazoid books (Nancy Reagan had a THING with Frank Sinatra while
- Ron met with the Cabinet!!!) that they don't want to waste ink and paper
- on "literary" stuff that has a rapidly diminishing audience.
-
- The salvation in all this is that the small "specialty" publishers are
- still open to break-in writers. Tom Clancy is the most obvious case.
- Red October was initially published by the Naval Institute Press after
- numerous rejections by "mainstream" publishers. They all wanted it once
- it was a "proven" market commodity. Another, less famous, example is
- Stephen Lawhead. His fantasy novels (with religious/philosophical themes)
- were published for years by Crossway (a small religious press with their
- distribution mainly through religious bookstores). Now his books are
- going to the "mainstream" market through Avon.
-
- It seems to be a possible trend: the small presses take on the new writers,
- then sell off the books to a bigger publisher after establishing a "track
- record" for the author.
-
- Cheer up, and send your book to publishers who are STILL buying first novels
- because they have a specific sub-market (and don't have to depend on
- "blockbuster" sales to make a profit).
-
-