home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.headlines
- Path: sparky!uunet!timbuk.cray.com!hemlock.cray.com!cherry10!dadams
- From: dadams@cray.com (David Adams)
- Subject: Re: Candidates and their women
- Message-ID: <1992Aug18.124914.18953@hemlock.cray.com>
- Lines: 39
- Reply-To: dadams@cray.com
- Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
- References: <13384.2a906e3f@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu>
- Date: 18 Aug 92 12:49:14 CDT
-
- In article 2a906e3f@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu, vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu () writes:
- |In article <ART.92Aug17100856@world.std.com>, art@world.std.com (Al Thompson) writes:
- |> In article <1992Aug15.094733.597@ccsvax.sfasu.edu> f_gautjw@ccsvax.sfasu.edu writes:
- |>
- |> In article <1992Aug15.014816.26727@pony.Ingres.COM>, garrett@Ingres.COM (QUOTE OF THE YEAR) writes:
- |> [...]
- |>
- |> But I think this misses the main point. Why has the press had
- |> free reign to bludgeon Gary Hart, Clinton and others with stories of
- |> their picadillos but seems to just now be coming out of its strait
- |> jacket with respect to GHWB?
- |>
- |> Because these is objective proof that Hart and Clinton were fooling
- |> around. There is no such evidence in Bush's case. The putative
- |> statements of a dead man don't count for much.
- |>
- |
- |Isn't it interesing how some people associated with controversy about
- |Reagan or Bush are conveniently dead?
- |
- |-Garrett
-
-
-
-
- Answer 1) Yea, they are pretty old arn't they? ;^)
-
-
-
-
- Answer 2) It is always easier to dig up a dead witness than a live
- one. You don't have to worry about whether he will
- contradict you when he is interviewed. It is especially
- easier to make unsubstantiated claims or start rumors.
-
-
-
- ---
- --David C. Adams
-