home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky misc.headlines:5629 alt.conspiracy:10006 alt.politics.clinton:1990 alt.politics.bush:1656
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!mips!mips!rtech!ingres!garrett
- From: garrett@Ingres.COM (QUOTE OF THE YEAR)
- Newsgroups: misc.headlines,alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush
- Subject: Re: Candidates and their women
- Message-ID: <1992Aug15.014816.26727@pony.Ingres.COM>
- Date: 15 Aug 92 01:48:16 GMT
- References: <STEINMAN.92Aug4084513@hawk.is.morgan.com> <1992Aug14.114954.16393@dg-rtp.dg.com>
- Distribution: na
- Organization: ASK Computer Systems, Ingres Product Division
- Lines: 18
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1
-
- In article <1992Aug14.114954.16393@dg-rtp.dg.com>, grossg@patriot.rtp.dg.com (Gross writes...
- >In article <STEINMAN.92Aug4084513@hawk.is.morgan.com> steinman@is.morgan.com (Jan Steinman) writes:
- >>I just heard a report this morning that Bush soundly rebuked his
- >>campaign manager for writing a press release that made references to
- >>Clinton's "bimbos". Also, my spouse just returned from UK, where she
- >>said the press is full of stories about Bush's womanizing in the past.
- >>
- >Actually, there is no accounting for the British tabloid press. Those
- >people thrive on innuendo and rumor.
- >
- I was wondering, just what does this have to do with whether a canidate
- would make a good president or not? This isn't sarcastic, or a jab. Just
- an honest question. Personally, I would rather a president get his "rocks
- off" over a woman than over the power of his position (no pun intended).
-
- Garrett@Ingres.com
-
- Disclaimer: My views are my own and nobody elses (and maybe not even mine)
-