home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!rich
- From: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu (Rich Winkel)
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
- Subject: ON THOUGHT AND ACTION: Nonviolent Struggle
- Message-ID: <1992Aug19.082307.27391@mont.cs.missouri.edu>
- Date: 19 Aug 92 08:23:07 GMT
- Article-I.D.: mont.1992Aug19.082307.27391
- Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
- Followup-To: alt.activism.d
- Organization: PACH
- Lines: 90
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Originator: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
-
- The ACTivist July/August 92
-
- The ACTivist is published monthly (one issue during July and August)
- by the ACT for Disarmament Coalition, 736 Bathurst St., Toronto,
- Ontario, Canada, M5S 2R4, phone 416-531-6154, fax 416-531-5850,
- e-mail web:act.
-
- Reprint freely, but please credit us (and send us a copy!)
-
- /** gen.newsletter: 121.20 **/
- ** Written 11:33 pm Aug 11, 1992 by web:act in cdp:gen.newsletter **
- ON THOUGHT AND ACTION
-
- Unarmed Forces
- Graeme MacQueen, ed.
- Science for Peace/Samuel Stevens
- pp.132
-
- Nonviolent Struggle and Social Defence
- Shelley Anderson and Janet Larmore, eds
- War Resisters' International
- pp. 146
-
- Reviewed by Maggie Helwig
-
- There is an almost disturbing similarity between these two books
- in their basic conception -- both the proceedings of conferences on
- nonviolent action against various forms of violence, edited into book
- form; both internationally focused; including some of the same
- contributors (notably Julio Quan and the omnipresent Gene Sharp);
- both, in fact, using the same tones-of-brown colour scheme and
- pictures of Palestinians holding up V-signs on the cover.
-
- The two cover pictures, however, are strikingly different, in some
- ways that pretty much encapsulate the differences between the
- two books. On Nonviolent Struggle and Social Defence, we see a
- crowd of young men and women, chanting, waving their arms, faces
- full of anger and joy and determination. On Unarmed Forces, there is
- a single very young girl in extreme close-up, one eye bandaged, her
- small hand held out in a touching and rather sad appeal.
-
- It is a beautifully composed photograph, and Unarmed Forces is a
- very skillfully assembled book. The result of a conference held at
- McMaster University in Hamilton in 1989, it was not published
- until last month, and it is clear that a good deal of care and thought
- went into selecting a few speeches to be reprinted, after editing to
- make them more of 'a book'. Nonviolent Struggle, on the other hand,
- was published in 1991 after a conference which took place in
- Bradford, England in 1990, and shows all the signs of a rush job --
- some pieces printed in question and answer format, some as essays,
- some as transcribed and barely edited speeches, and the whole
- thing concluded by a long and essentially point-form essay by Brian
- Martin on "Arguments and Actions" for social defense.
-
- Finally, it depends what you want out of a book. Unarmed Forces
- is a better read, first of all. It is more thoughtful, in some ways.
- Many of the pieces have a more vivid sense of the people speaking,
- and their own feelings about the place of nonviolence in their lives
- and work. It raises in a more systematic way some of the
- philosophical problems in nonviolent action -- for instance, the
- relationship of nonviolent activists to the 'structural violence' of
- systematic starvation in Central America and elsewhere.
-
- Having attended the McMaster conference, however, I know
- how much was left out to create this thoughtful, finished impression,
- and I am sorry for the loss of many valuable if not so well-organized
- panel and roundtable discussions. I particularly regret that the
- hastily-organized workshop on women dealing with violence in
- their own lives does not appear at all in the written record of the
- proceedings.
-
- For anyone concerned to put ideas of nonviolent defence or
- nonviolent social change into action, Nonviolent Struggle is going
- to be a considerably more useful tool. The sort of half-finished
- feeling which makes it less, well, intellectually pleasing than
- Unarmed Forces also challenges the reader to keep thinking. It is
- not a final word on anything, but a sharing of some experiences,
- some ideas and some strategies -- and very much concerned that
- these strategies should be used.
-
- Ideally, I suppose, one would be able to have both books available,
- and use them to bounce off each other in all sorts of potentially
- interesting ways. Given that most of us probably can't have both,
- I would give a slight edge to Nonviolent Struggle and Social Defence.
- It is not such a good read -- and Unarmed Forces is a very good
- read -- but it has a bit more of a chance of making something
- actually happen in the world.
-
-
- ** End of text from cdp:gen.newsletter **
-