home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!sun-barr!rutgers!news.cs.indiana.edu!umn.edu!thompson
- From: thompson@atlas.socsci.umn.edu (T. Scott Thompson)
- Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help
- Subject: Re: C-s problems
- Message-ID: <thompson.713629017@kiyotaki.econ.umn.edu>
- Date: 12 Aug 92 14:16:57 GMT
- References: <1992Aug11.200128.25622@seas.smu.edu> <KEVIN.92Aug12100941@buffalobill.edscom.demon.co.uk>
- Sender: news@news2.cis.umn.edu (Usenet News Administration)
- Distribution: gnu.emacs.help
- Organization: University of Minnesota
- Lines: 67
- Nntp-Posting-Host: kiyotaki.econ.umn.edu
-
- kevin@edscom.demon.co.uk (Kevin Broadey) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Aug11.200128.25622@seas.smu.edu> pedersen@seas.smu.edu (Ted Pedersen) writes:
-
- > I am a new emacs user and am having a very good time learning my way around.
- > However, a problem has come up. It seems that whenever I use the C-s key
- > (either as a part of a C-x C-s command or to do a forward search) I just
- > lock up. Nothing registers on the little mini buffer and I usually have to
- > bail all the way out of emacs. Note that C-r (the backward search) works very
- > well. Anybody have any ideas of what this might be and/or what I can do to
- > get around it.
-
- > Thanks,
- > Ted Pedersen
-
-
- >This looks like a flow control problem, because C-s (otherwise known as XOFF)
- >is a standard way for a terminal to tell the host to stop sending it
- >characters.
-
- >Now, Emacs ought to set the terminal driver to pass flow control characters
- >straight through (rather than action them), so my guess is you're using
- >something like a DEC-VT220...
-
- >In the `Communications Set-Up' menu is a field at the start of the second line
- >which reads "XOFF at 64", "XOFF at 128" or "NO XOFF". If it is set to one of
- >the first two, typing `C-s' causes the VT to lock the display _immediately_,
- >wait for a few more characters (maybe), then send `C-s' to the host. What you
- >need to do is set it to "NO XOFF" so that the VT passes `C-s' straight to the
- >host.
-
- This doesn't sound right to me. More precisely, it is incomplete.
- Your explanation essentially states that the terminal sends C-s (XOFF)
- to the host when you press C-s at the keyboard. This is undoubtably
- correct, but is probably not the source of the problem. After all,
- sending out C-s is exactly what we want the terminal to do!
-
- I do not know the specifics of the DEC-VT220, but I suspect that the
- various "XOFF" commands mentioned control how the terminal responds to
- data arriving too fast from the host. That is, when you set "XOFF at
- 64" this probably means "OK terminal, if your input buffer has less
- than 64 free bytes you should _automatically_ send out a C-s to tell
- the host to stop sending."
-
- But this is a digression. The real problem is that when the host
- _receives_ the C-s it is interpretting it as the message "stop sending
- characters" instead of passing it along to emacs. That is, the
- flowcontrol processing _at_the_recieving_end_ prevents emacs from ever
- seeing the C-s. It also causes the host to temporarily stop echoing
- characters back to the terminal, which is why your terminal _appears_
- to be locked. (It isn't really locked in all likelihood.)
-
- Ideally emacs will turn off XON/XOFF flowcontrol at the host
- automatically when it is in command. However there are situations when
- emacs cannot do the job. For example, I usually connect to my host
- through a network terminal server that does its own flowcontrol
- processing. Unless I turn that off (manually) when I make the
- connection, the host never even receives the C-s, since it is
- intercepted and processed by the terminal server.
-
- Bottom line: The problem _is_ flow control. The solution is likely to
- be more complicated than simply turning off XON/XOFF flowcontrol at
- the terminal end.
-
- T. Scott Thompson thompson@atlas.socsci.umn.edu
- Dept. of Economics
- University of Minnesota
-