home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!socrates!berry
- From: berry@socrates.umd.edu (Joseph Berry)
- Subject: Re: MP CPU-time phenomena
- Message-ID: <1992Aug16.042352.26037@socrates.umd.edu>
- Organization: University of Maryland University College
- References: <1992Aug6.214740.164@socrates.umd.edu> <15250002@hprpcd.rose.hp.com> <1992Aug14.063450.25740@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <1992Aug15.172139.13498@ctr.columbia.edu>
- Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 04:23:52 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- >>>There's no reason that a processor switch could not occur anywhere in
- >>>the code... In a 10 second window, all processors could have a chance to
- >>>execute the code stream.
- >>
-
- Let me try and clarify the original question better (I work with the
- person who posted the question). We have a monitoring tool (that's
- what our company writes -- performance tools) that works on a couple of
- different MP UNIX machines. We observed the following 'weird' phenomona:
- while monitoring the CPU stats of a given process (the very simple CPU
- loop example where there is nothing really to parallelize assuming the
- compiler (standard UNIX SVR3 cc) can parallelize anything anyway, we
- noted that during a 10 second window, this process frequently consumed
- far more than 5 seconds worth of CPU time (sometimes as high as 8 sec).
- Most of the time, however, it was using just about 5 secs which is what
- one would expect it to use (1/2 of 2 cpus). Is there any way to explain
- this phenomona? This was observed on both SCO MPX and SUN's 600MP
- systems.
-
- joe
-
- +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | Joe Berry |
- | Strategic Software Group, Ltd., 3402 Shelburne Rd, Baltimore, MD 21208 |
- | E-mail: joe@ssgltd.com or uunet!ssgltd!joe |
- | Phone: 410-764-5668; Fax: 410-358-2106; Pager: 410-796-6861 |
- +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- t
-
-