home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!mips!darwin.sura.net!Sirius.dfn.de!fauern!fauna!camelot!husemann
- From: husemann@camelot.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Dirk Husemann)
- Subject: Re: 680x0 version of 386BSD?? [Was: Re: Mac version of 386BSD??]
- References: <1992Aug20.173817.21681@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>
- Message-ID: <BtBMwq.411@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
- Sender: news@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de
- Organization: CSD., University of Erlangen
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 06:48:25 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- tom@afthree.as.arizona.edu (Thomas J. Trebisky) writes:
-
- >In fact if I had an hp300, I could just about open the can, heat and eat.
- >I get the impression the guys at Berkeley actually had hp300's on their
- >desks, but I could just be starting a rumor.
-
- As far as I know they do. (I do, too 8=). I'm running pre-alpha 4.4 BSD on it
- --- I think the CSRG also put in the support for 68040s.
-
- >But this doesn't mean it will be easy. If it was easy, I would drop it
- >and go find something hard to do. :-)
-
- Once the unencumbered version is out I think it should be easier to port to
- other 68k machines than it was for Bill & Lynne to port to the 386/486
- architecture.
-
- Dirk
-
- Eunuchs [u'nuks] is not a trademark of AT&T.
- ---
-
-