home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Path: sparky!uunet!spooky!witr
- From: witr@rwwa.COM (Robert Withrow)
- Subject: Re: Restrictions on 'free' UNIX / 386BSD (Re: selling 386BSD)
- Message-ID: <1992Aug18.142711.8418@rwwa.COM>
- Sender: news@rwwa.COM (News Administrator)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: spooky
- Reply-To: witr@rwwa.com
- Organization: R.W. Withrow Associates
- References: <PHR.92Aug15151100@soda.berkeley.edu> <63DILTJ@taronga.com> <PHR.92Aug17003618@soda.berkeley.edu>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 14:27:11 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- The false (and pernicious) implication in statements like the following
- truly annoys me.
-
- In article <PHR.92Aug17003618@soda.berkeley.edu>,
- phr@soda.berkeley.edu (Paul Rubin) writes:
-
- | Years ago, somebody I'll call X announced he was writing a big free
- | software system and called for volunteers to donate code. I
- | contributed a program [...] Then when the big system was
- | released, he made the whole thing proprietary to himself.
-
- The implication is that somehow Paul's code has been ``taken'' from him.
-
- Wrong. Absent contractural obligations, code Paul wrote is still Paul's,
- and he is free to distribute it anyway he wants. The same is true of
- the other N people who contributed to X. If Paul and his friends
- wanted to distribute the ``X'' system themselves there would be nothing
- to stop them.
-
- Of course, if there *are* contractural obligations, then Paul has little
- excuse for being surprised by the outcome; contracts are volentary and
- involve mutual consideration.
-
- --
- ---
- Robert Withrow, R.W. Withrow Associates, Swampscott MA 01907 USA
- Tel: +1 617 598 4480, Fax: +1 617 598 4430, Net: witr@rwwa.COM
-