home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Path: sparky!uunet!ferkel.ucsb.edu!ferkel!jim
- From: jim@ferkel.ucsb.edu (Jim Lick)
- Subject: Re: Restrictions on 'free' UNIX / 386BSD (Re: selling 386BSD)
- Message-ID: <jim.714115328@ferkel>
- Organization: University of California, Santa Barbara
- References: <63DILTJ@taronga.com> <PHR.92Aug15214245@soda.berkeley.edu> <22221@venera.isi.edu> <1992Aug18.020754.8683@fcom.cc.utah.edu>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 05:22:08 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In <1992Aug18.020754.8683@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) writes:
- >How do you synchronize this with the $100 and/or "reasonable copying fee"
- >from the GPL? Charge $300 for the book?
-
- You are under a false impression. The GPL does NOT put a limit on what
- someone may charge for an FSF product. The limitation of a charge which
- covers the cost of duplication applies only to source code for the product
- in the case that source code was not provided in the sale product. Thus,
- you could easily sell a FSF product at a price where you could profit.
- Let's say you want to sell GCC for $500. If you include source code with
- this, then you are done. If you don't include source code, any customer can
- come up later and ask for a copy of the source which you must provide at
- cost. In general if there is a savings in media costs for the main product
- without source as opposed to with source, it would probably be more cost
- effective in the long run to sell it without source. But if you sell on
- some large capacity media like tape or CD-ROM, you probably have plenty of
- room left over, so you might as well throw it in and save the hassles later.
-
- Jim Lick
- Work: University of California | Play: 1236 Camino Meleno
- Santa Barbara | Santa Barbara, CA 93111-1007
- Dept. of Mechanical Engr. | (805) 964-2088 voice/msg
- 2311 Engr II Building | (805) MUD-SPY1 data
- (805) 893-4113 | jim@tcp.com
- jim@ferkel.ucsb.edu | This space intentionally left blank
-