home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!isi.edu!allard
- From: allard@isi.edu (Dennis Allard)
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Subject: Re: Restrictions on 'free' UNIX / 386BSD (Re: selling 386BSD)
- Message-ID: <22221@venera.isi.edu>
- Date: 17 Aug 92 22:05:34 GMT
- References: <MNDIKJ3@taronga.com> <PHR.92Aug15151100@soda.berkeley.edu> <63DILTJ@taronga.com> <PHR.92Aug15214245@soda.berkeley.edu>
- Sender: news@isi.edu
- Reply-To: allard@isi.edu (Dennis Allard)
- Distribution: world
- Organization: USC Information Sciences Institute
- Lines: 30
-
- peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
- > It's the absence of copyleft that leads to the possibility of more
- > than a bunch of random hackers benefiting from it.
- >
- > phr@soda.berkeley.edu (Paul Rubin) writes:
- > >Please clarify this. How is anyone else prevented from benefitting
- > >from it? Say, for example, the same people who now benefit from GCC?
- >
- > The people who aren't hackers and don't have net access, who want to walk
- > down to the store and buy a shrinkwrapped copy of ...
-
- As you know, there is nothing in copyleft which prevents anyone from
- selling a copylefted item. The requirement is that, even if they sell
- it, they are not allowed to prevent it being copied and redistributed
- at the will of any owner, and they must include the copyleft notice with
- the item so that that any new owner be suject to the copyleft.
-
- So, you might argue, that prevents shrink wrapping since noone would
- buy it. I wonder about that. The advantages to shrink wrapping,
- viz., on the shelf availability, quality bound documentation, tech.
- support for registered owners, update mailing list membership, etc.
- are often worth the price of shrinkwrap, even if a free copy (or
- stolen copy, in the case of noncopyleft material) is avaiable at no
- charge.
-
- True, we don't see examples of shrinkwrapped copylefted stuff at
- the software houses. Maybe a publisher should give it a try!
-
- Dennis Allard
- allard@isi.edu
-