home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!cs.weber.edu!terry
- From: terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C)
- Subject: Re: Restrictions on 'free' UNIX / 386BSD (Re: selling 386BSD)
- Message-ID: <1992Aug16.210036.17095@fcom.cc.utah.edu>
- Sender: news@fcom.cc.utah.edu
- Organization: Weber State University (Ogden, UT)
- References: <l8n8qcINN2c5@neuro.usc.edu> <PHR.92Aug15151100@soda.berkeley.edu> <63DILTJ@taronga.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Aug 92 21:00:36 GMT
- Lines: 30
-
- In article <63DILTJ@taronga.com> peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
- >In article <PHR.92Aug15151100@soda.berkeley.edu> phr@soda.berkeley.edu (Paul Rubin) writes:
- >>Try to think a little more clearly. It is the ABSENCE of copyleft
- >>that leads to the possibility of non-freely-redistributable versions.
- >>The copyleft was designed to prevent that from happening. If 386bsd
- >>was copylefted, these flames wouldn't be happening.
- >
- >If 386BSD was copylefted, it would be Linux. It's the absence of copyleft
- >that leads to the possibility of more than a bunch of random hackers
- >benefiting from it.
-
- Here, here! It is difficult to contribute anything to an assembly of
- "copyleft" code without violating "copyleft" or incorporating the
- restrictions so as to apply to your own code.
-
- Or, put another way: It's hard to contribute code to Linux and
- Berkeley (or anything else) at the same time.
-
-
- Terry Lambert
- terry_lambert@gateway.novell.com
- terry@icarus.weber.edu
- ---
- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
- or previous employers.
- --
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- terry@icarus.weber.edu
- "I have an 8 user poetic license" - me
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-