home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #18 / NN_1992_18.iso / spool / comp / text / tex / 10091 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-08-12  |  765 b   |  24 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!eclnews!rodin!kevin
  3. From: kevin@rodin.wustl.edu (Kevin Ruland)
  4. Subject: AMSLaTeX vs LaTeX 2.09
  5. Message-ID: <1992Aug12.171922.2321@wuecl.wustl.edu>
  6. Sender: usenet@wuecl.wustl.edu (Usenet Administrator)
  7. Nntp-Posting-Host: rodin
  8. Organization: Center for Optimization and Semantic Control, Washington University
  9. Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 17:19:22 GMT
  10. Lines: 12
  11.  
  12.  
  13. Ok, I'm going to express a great amount of ignorance.
  14.  
  15. The big question: Is AMSLaTeX (using oldlfont.sty or whatever) roughly
  16. backwardly compatible to LaTeX 2.09?  I realize that stylefiles may not
  17. be portable, but could the typical user *easily* port his papers from
  18. the old to the new?
  19.  
  20. Thanks for your patience.
  21.  
  22. Kevin Ruland
  23. kevin@rodin.wustl.edu
  24.