home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!warwick!kingpol!francis
- From: francis@kingston.ac.uk (Francis Bell)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.novell
- Subject: Re: Routing TCP/IP through a Novell server
- Summary: Anyone care to tell me how ??
- Keywords: routing, TCP/IP
- Message-ID: <1992Aug13.122244.14827@kingston.ac.uk>
- Date: 13 Aug 92 12:22:44 GMT
- References: <1992May9.214953.6692@willamette.edu> <1992May9.172817.55355@cc.usu.edu>
- Sender: fgtbell@kingston.ac.uk
- Followup-To: comp.sys.novell
- Organization: Kingston University
- Lines: 197
-
- In article <1992May9.172817.55355@cc.usu.edu> jrd@cc.usu.edu writes:
- >In article <1992May9.214953.6692@willamette.edu>, dan@willamette.edu (Daneher D. Revel) writes:
- >> I would like to be able to use a Netware server to route TCP/IP traffic
- >> between a Novell LAN and our campus wide TCP/IP backbone, here's a
- >> picture:
- We're trying to do the same thing, and it's driving me nuts. We have a
- Novell server running 3.11 and a pair of 3c507's installed. Are there
- any known problems with 3c507s ? The workstations on the local
- (Novell) segment can "see" the first 3c507 but not the second. Yes
- we do have tcpip forward=yes. We're using LAN workplace for DOS on
- the workstations, and we can use tnvt220 to reach the "closer" of
- the two boards on its test port, 19 (tnvt220 141.241.12.2 19 works fine).
- The second (further) 3c507's test port does not respond, neither
- does anything further down the main backbone. Tcpcon reports that
- ipforwards = 0, even after several attempts,
- which is reassuring, because at least it isn't saying
- "Gateway functions disabled"
-
- Here's a copy of the autoexec.ncf file :
-
-
- file server name PALLAS
- ipx internal net 204
- rem board 1 at 300 sees local network
- load c:3C507 port=300 mem=D0000 int=3 frame=ETHERNET_802.3 name=IPX_300
- bind IPX to IPX_300 net=234
- rem board at 320 sees main network
- load c:3c507 port=320 mem=d8000 int=7 frame=ETHERNET_802.3 name=IPX_320
- bind IPX to IPX_320 net=200
-
- load c:3c507 port=300 mem=D0000 int=3 frame=ETHERNET_II name=IP_300
- load c:3c507 port=320 mem=d8000 int=7 frame=ETHERNET_II name=IP_320
-
- load tcpip forward=yes rip=yes
- load snmplog
-
- rem bind local board to segment 12
- bind IP to IP_300 addr=141.241.12.2 mask=ff.ff.fc.00
- rem bind remote board to segment 4
- bind IP to IP_320 addr=141.241.4.28 mask=ff.ff.fc.00
-
- mount all
- load remote khpallas
- load rspx
- load tsa
- load monitor
- set timezone gmt0bst
- set reply to get nearest server = on
- load rarpserv
-
-
- >--------------------------------------------------------------------->
-
- Our main network has IPX number 200. 141.241.4 has all our mainframe
- services, so that side of the router should be able to see them.
- Again our topology looks like this:
- >>
- >> LAN workplace LAN workplace
- >> for DOS for DOS Novell LAN (IPX & TCP/IP)
- >> -+---------+---------+- 141.241.12.*
- >> Netware
- >> Server
- >> 141.241.4.* +--------------> campus backbone TCP/IP
- >> and IPX
-
- Yours,
- Desperate.
-
- Seriously it would be nice to know why this isn't working.
- Please respond by e-mail if possible.
-
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.novell
- Subject: Re: Routing TCP/IP through a Novell server
- Summary:
- Expires:
- References: <1992May9.214953.6692@willamette.edu> <1992May9.172817.55355@cc.usu.edu>
- Sender:
- Followup-To:
- Distribution:
- Organization: Kingston University
- Keywords:
-
- In article <1992May9.172817.55355@cc.usu.edu> jrd@cc.usu.edu writes:
- >In article <1992May9.214953.6692@willamette.edu>, dan@willamette.edu (Daneher D. Revel) writes:
- >> I would like to be able to use a Netware server to route TCP/IP traffic
- >> between a Novell LAN and our campus wide TCP/IP backbone, here's a
- >> picture:
- We're trying to do the same thing, and it's driving me nuts. We have a
- Novell server running 3.11 and a pair of 3c507's installed. Are there
- any known problems with 3c507s ? The workstations on the local
- (Novell) segment can "see" the first 3c507 but not the second. Yes
- we do have tcpip forward=yes. We're using LAN workplace for DOS on
- the workstations, and we can use tnvt220 to reach the "closer" of
- the two boards on its test port, 19 (tnvt220 141.241.12.2 19 works fine).
- The second (further) 3c507's test port does not respond, neither
- does anything further down the main backbone. Tcpcon reports that
- ipforwards = 0, even after several attempts,
- which is reassuring, because at least it isn't saying
- "Gateway functions disabled"
-
- Here's a copy of the autoexec.ncf file :
-
-
- file server name PALLAS
- ipx internal net 204
- rem board 1 at 300 sees local network
- load c:3C507 port=300 mem=D0000 int=3 frame=ETHERNET_802.3 name=IPX_300
- bind IPX to IPX_300 net=234
- rem board at 320 sees main network
- load c:3c507 port=320 mem=d8000 int=7 frame=ETHERNET_802.3 name=IPX_320
- bind IPX to IPX_320 net=200
-
- load c:3c507 port=300 mem=D0000 int=3 frame=ETHERNET_II name=IP_300
- load c:3c507 port=320 mem=d8000 int=7 frame=ETHERNET_II name=IP_320
-
- load tcpip forward=yes rip=yes
- load snmplog
-
- rem bind local board to segment 12
- bind IP to IP_300 addr=141.241.12.2 mask=ff.ff.fc.00
- rem bind remote board to segment 4
- bind IP to IP_320 addr=141.241.4.28 mask=ff.ff.fc.00
-
- mount all
- load remote khpallas
- load rspx
- load tsa
- load monitor
- set timezone gmt0bst
- set reply to get nearest server = on
- load rarpserv
-
-
- >--------------------------------------------------------------------->
-
- Our main network has IPX number 200. 141.241.4 has all our mainframe
- services, so that side of the router should be able to see them.
- Again our topology looks like this:
- >>
- >> LAN workplace LAN workplace
- >> for DOS for DOS Novell LAN (IPX & TCP/IP)
- >> -+---------+---------+- 141.241.12.*
- >> Netware
- >> Server
- >> 141.241.4.* +--------------> campus backbone TCP/IP
- >> and IPX
-
- Yours,
- Desperate.
-
- Seriously it would be nice to know why this isn't working.
- Please respond by e-mail if possible.
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.novell
- Subject: Re: Routing TCP/IP through a Novell server
- Summary:
- Expires:
- References: <1992May9.214953.6692@willamette.edu> <1992May9.172817.55355@cc.usu.edu>
- Sender:
- Followup-To:
- Distribution:
- Organization: Kingston University
- Keywords:
-
- In article <1992May9.172817.55355@cc.usu.edu> jrd@cc.usu.edu writes:
- >In article <1992May9.214953.6692@willamette.edu>, dan@willamette.edu (Daneher D. Revel) writes:
- >> I would like to be able to use a Netware server to route TCP/IP traffic
- >> between a Novell LAN and our campus wide TCP/IP backbone, here's a
- >> picture:
- >>
- >>
- >>
- >>
- >>
- >> LAN workplace LAN workplace \
- >> for DOS for DOS /\Novell LAN (SPX/IPX & TCP/IP)
- >> -+---------+---------+-
- >> Netware
- >> Server
- >> +--------------> campus backbone (TCP/IP only)
- >>
- >> Can it be done? and,
- > Yes, it's done all the time in many many places.
- >> What do I need to do to acheive this?
- > Two things. First is NW 3.11, nothing less will do IP routing. Second
- >is either TCP/IP experience or some long chats with your local TCP/IP
- >Responsible Person to get the addressing and subnetting straight (which can
- >be quite a puzzle sometimes). The NW server will be an IP router, not an
- >IP bridge (though I keep recommending this option to Novell as a useful
- >alternative), so one must divide the address space. You do not need to purchase
- >the NFS.NLM to route IP, the needed materials are shipped with NW 3.11.
- > Joe D.
- >>
- >> Thanks...
- >> --
- >> Dan Revel (dan@willamette.edu) Nullum
- >> Network and Technical Services Manager Gratuitum
- >> Willamette University Prandium
-