home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!bu.edu!dartvax!coos.dartmouth.edu!hades
- From: hades@coos.dartmouth.edu (Hades)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
- Subject: Re: comp.sys.mac.powerbook
- Message-ID: <1992Aug20.143236.13393@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
- Date: 20 Aug 92 14:32:36 GMT
- References: <1992Aug18.145156.14050@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> <6344@ucru2.ucr.edu>
- Sender: news@dartvax.dartmouth.edu (The News Manager)
- Reply-To: hades@Dartmouth.Edu
- Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
- Lines: 24
- Disclaimer: Personally, I really don't care who you think I speak for.
- Moderator: Rec.Arts.Comics.Info
-
- judson@watnxt2.ucr.edu (Michael Judson) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Aug18.145156.14050@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
- >geoffb@coos.dartmouth.edu (Geoff Bronner) writes:
-
- >> Specific groups for specific Macs is a BAD IDEA (tm) IMO.
-
- >Well, a Powerbook is not a specific computer. Why have comp.sys.mac.*
- >and not just have comp.sys.apple.* that would cover all apple computers.
- >Powerbooks are starting to become as diverse to Macintosh as Macintosh
- >has become to Aplle. Thus, I do see a need, if not now, then eventually
- >(soon) for comp.sys.mac.Powerbook, or comp.sys.powerbook.
-
- Actually, the PowerBook is just another type of Mac. Granted is has
- a number of different configurations, but it is still just another Mac.
- But just for arguments sake, what kind of things would be discussed in a
- comp.sys.mac.powerbook that couldn't be discussed in one of the normal
- comp.sys.mac.* groups?
-
- --
- -Hades (Brian V. Hughes) Moderator: Rec.Arts.Comics.Info
- "A clear case of curare poisoning
- of one of her Majesty's Cold-Cream Guards"
- -- Durlock Holmes
-