home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ferkel.ucsb.edu!taco!lll-winken!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!news!proton!ucru2!watnxt2.ucr.edu
- From: judson@watnxt2.ucr.edu (Michael Judson)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
- Subject: Re: comp.sys.mac.powerbook
- Message-ID: <6344@ucru2.ucr.edu>
- Date: 19 Aug 92 22:53:03 GMT
- References: <1992Aug18.145156.14050@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
- Sender: news@ucru2.ucr.edu
- Lines: 23
- Nntp-Posting-Host: watnxt06.ucr.edu
-
- In article <1992Aug18.145156.14050@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
- geoffb@coos.dartmouth.edu (Geoff Bronner) writes:
- > In <6255@ucru2.ucr.edu> judson@watnxt2.ucr.edu (Michael Judson) writes:
- >
- > >Reading through the various mac newsgroups, I think there are enough posts
- > >regarding powerbooks to justify a newsgroup devoted solely for powerbooks.
- > >Does anyone else agree.
-
- > No, I don't. the comp.sys.mac hierarchy provides a place for any post on
- > the PowerBook, or any other Mac for that matter.
-
- > Specific groups for specific Macs is a BAD IDEA (tm) IMO.
-
- Well, a Powerbook is not a specific computer. Why have comp.sys.mac.*
- and not just have comp.sys.apple.* that would cover all apple computers.
- Powerbooks are starting to become as diverse to Macintosh as Macintosh
- has become to Aplle. Thus, I do see a need, if not now, then eventually
- (soon) for comp.sys.mac.Powerbook, or comp.sys.powerbook.
-
- --
- "I drank what?" -- Socrates
-
- judson@watserv.ucr.edu
-