home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!umd5!mac43-pg2.umd.edu!user
- From: de19@umail.umd.edu (Dana S Emery)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
- Subject: Re: Re: TN 31 relevancy vs sys 6.0.x
- Message-ID: <de19-220892121448@mac43-pg2.umd.edu>
- Date: 22 Aug 92 16:24:01 GMT
- References: <de19-210892053615@mac45-pg2.umd.edu> <sold.75.714429006@kit.uni-kl.de>
- Sender: news@umd5.umd.edu
- Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.programmer
- Organization: Personal
- Lines: 34
-
- In article <sold.75.714429006@kit.uni-kl.de>, sold@kit.uni-kl.de (Christoph
- Sold) wrote:
- >
- > In article <de19-210892053615@mac45-pg2.umd.edu> de19@umail.umd.edu (Dana S Emery) writes:
- > >Subject: TN 31 relevancy vs sys 6.0.x
- > >From: de19@umail.umd.edu (Dana S Emery)
- > >Date: 21 Aug 92 09:56:02 GMT
- > >I tried to pull a current copy of TN 31, but ftp.apple.com no-gotem.
- >
- > They have it. Get the technote stack, it is in there.
-
- Id love too, but I just dont seem to have 6MB free at the moment, also, I
- dont have any faith that the stack version is any better in sync with
- reallity. In case you were asleep at the switch, I *am* RTFTN, the Q is if
- the version I have is actually relevant, and I would really appreciate a
- straight answer. I think I have paid some dues to this group over the past
- year, albeit mostly by mail, and now would appreciate a little sympathy.
-
- For those who have already read and rejected, I repeat myself:
-
-
- My 1988 version of TN 31 states that as of system 4.1, (paraphrased)
-
- > TEStylInsert will misbehave if the TE record is not active.
-
- Can anyone confirm that this is still true under, say, 6.0.7?
-
- My environment is Think Pascal v.4.0.1, using TCL 1.1.2.
-
- --
-
- Dana S Emery <de19@umail.umd.edu> | "Novo, de Novo, de novo, de
- no-o-o-o-o---,
- | Novemba come an' dey gonna go home."
-