home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!convex!darwin.sura.net!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!olivea!isc-br!tau-ceti!jimc
- From: jimc@tau-ceti.isc-br.com (Jim Cathey)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
- Subject: Re: MacTCP (UDP) questions
- Message-ID: <2541@tau-ceti.isc-br.com>
- Date: 20 Aug 92 02:21:12 GMT
- References: <1992Aug19.173303.14543@vax5.cit.cornell.edu>
- Distribution: comp
- Organization: ISC - Bunker Ramo, Spokane, WA
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <1992Aug19.173303.14543@vax5.cit.cornell.edu> tcd@vax5.cit.cornell.edu writes:
- > I am working on an application that needs to transfer a continuous,
- >high volume stream of data from one Macintosh to another. Because we
- >can tolerate some amount of data loss/corruption it seemed like UDP
- >would be a better choice than TCP.
-
- Mac-to-Mac? Does anybody remember Appletalk? Y'know, the networking
- protocol built into _every_ Mac since '84? Why not use that?
-
- Enquiring minds want to know...
-
- --
- +----------------+
- ! II CCCCCC ! Jim Cathey
- ! II SSSSCC ! ISC-Bunker Ramo
- ! II CC ! TAF-C8; Spokane, WA 99220
- ! IISSSS CC ! UUCP: uunet!isc-br!jimc (jimc@isc-br.isc-br.com)
- ! II CCCCCC ! (509) 927-5757
- +----------------+
- "PC's --- the junk bonds of the computer industry"
-