home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!bu.edu!dartvax!coos.dartmouth.edu!hades
- From: hades@coos.dartmouth.edu (Hades)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
- Subject: Re: Mac II differences
- Message-ID: <1992Aug21.144936.1250@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
- Date: 21 Aug 92 14:49:36 GMT
- References: <1992Aug19.232232.21312@math.ucla.edu> <20870@optima.cs.arizona.edu>
- Sender: news@dartvax.dartmouth.edu (The News Manager)
- Reply-To: hades@Dartmouth.Edu
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
- Lines: 27
- Disclaimer: Personally, I really don't care who you think I speak for.
- Moderator: Rec.Arts.Comics.Info
-
- jtgorman@cs.arizona.edu (J. Taggart Gorman) writes:
-
-
- > Didya notice this :
-
- > II_x
- > IIcx
- > IIci
- > IIfx
- > IIsi
- > IIvi
- > IIvx
- > ^
-
- > It's in alphabetical order! (First letter, with _ being lowest.) Sure,
- >Quadras, Performs, compact Macs and all other designs fall out, but I think I
- >have a clue why the IIsi has an 's' and the new machines have a 'v'...
-
- Did you also notice that Apple suddenly reversed their use of the i
- and x suffixes? It used to go IIcx < IIci, but they seem to be moving in
- the other direction now where IIvi < IIvx.
-
- --
- -Hades (Brian V. Hughes) Moderator: Rec.Arts.Comics.Info
- "A clear case of curare poisoning
- of one of her Majesty's Cold-Cream Guards"
- -- Durlock Holmes
-