home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!bskendig
- From: bskendig@netcom.com (Brian Kendig)
- Subject: Re: Mac II differences
- Message-ID: <ha#nk0a.bskendig@netcom.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 92 05:08:40 GMT
- Organization: Starfleet Headquarters: San Francisco
- References: <1992Aug19.232232.21312@math.ucla.edu>
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <1992Aug19.232232.21312@math.ucla.edu> dchopp@vicente.math.ucla.edu (David Chopp) writes:
- >I may be the only one that's confused, but could someone please tell me,
- >very roughly, what the difference is between all the Mac II's. So far I've
- >seen IIx, IIfx, IIcx, IIci, IIsi, and now IIvx, IIvi. Is there some
- >hierarchy of capabilities and compatibility? I don't really want a
- >detailed analysis, just a rough idea of how they compare. Thanks...
-
- Hmm, lemme think. This is all from memory, but here goes:
-
- CPU Speed Coproc- Int
- Machine 68xxx (MHz) essor? Slots mike?
-
- II 020 16 yes 6 no
- IIx 030 16 yes 6 no
- IIvi 030 16 no 3 yes
- IIcx 030 20 yes 3 no
- IIsi 030 20 no 1 yes
- IIci 030 25 yes 3 no
- IIvx 030 32 yes 3 yes
- IIfx 030 33 yes 6 no
-
- Now where did I go wrong? ;)
-
- << Brian >>
-
- --
- _/_/_/ Brian Kendig Macintosh Jedi Live never to be ashamed
- _/_/ Starfleet Captain Oracle Employee if anything you do or say
- _/ Intrepid Adventurer Saturn SL2 Owner is published around the world
- bskendig@netcom.com Twin Peaks Junkie -- even if what is published
- Princeton '92! BSE/CS Writer/Actor/Singer is not true.
-