home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!taligent!ditka.taligent.com!user
- From: amfahr@taligent.com (Jeff Amfahr)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
- Subject: Re: System 6.0.6???
- Message-ID: <amfahr-190892203328@ditka.taligent.com>
- Date: 20 Aug 92 03:36:33 GMT
- References: <Bt3F4v.B52@iat.holonet.net>
- Sender: usenet@taligent.com (More Bytes Than You Can Read)
- Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.hardware
- Organization: Taligent
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <Bt3F4v.B52@iat.holonet.net>, kellys@orac.holonet.net (Kelly
- Schwarzhoff) wrote:
- >
- > I was just reading Newsbytes and read an article in which a program recommends
- > System 6.0.6 or higher. Question: I know abou System 6.0.5 and System 6.0.7,
- > but what exactly is the difference between 6.0.5 and 6.0.6? I don't remember
- > ever hearing about 6.0.6.
- >
- >
- > --
- > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- > Kelly Schwarzhoff
- > Internet: kellys@orac.holonet.net Fidonet: 1:161/445.0
- > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- System 6.0.6 was actual the short-lived predecessor to 6.0.7. It only saw
- the light of day in Europe. It turns out that right before ship (and I mean
- RIGHT before ship) some fairly nasty bugs were found. They were fixed for
- the release in the U.S. (which was called 6.0.7), but there wasn't time to
- role all the new international versions. So outside of the U.S. people got
- 6.0.6 with patch INIT (sort of like Tune-Up). And of course all this
- happened right as 7.0 was trying to go beta.
-
- Jeff Amfahr
- Taligent
- These opinions are mine. But they can be yours for a price.
-