home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun.tamu.edu!tamuts!jczhelp
- From: jczhelp@tamuts.tamu.edu (John Zurawski)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard
- Subject: Re: ModPlay Assembly Module for SB-Pro
- Message-ID: <1992Aug19.213554.29246@tamsun.tamu.edu>
- Date: 19 Aug 92 21:35:54 GMT
- Article-I.D.: tamsun.1992Aug19.213554.29246
- References: <1992Aug17.230414.58222@cc.usu.edu> <1992Aug18.222326.1@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz> <1992Aug19.051812.5654@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
- Sender: news@tamsun.tamu.edu (Read News)
- Organization: ~/lib/organization
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1992Aug19.051812.5654@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> gerace@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (Jerry Gerace) writes:
- >In article <1992Aug18.222326.1@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz> heath_m@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz writes:
- >>In article <1992Aug17.230414.58222@cc.usu.edu>, sl8nl@cc.usu.edu writes:
- >>>>
- >>>> Does anyone have the assembly information needed for the SB-Pro in
- >>>> ModPlay 2.19B? I would really like to use ModPlay in stereo, as it is the
- >>>> most accurate player I have.
- >>>> Hope someone can help,
- >>>
- >>> Have you tried looking at the WOWII module player by Jan Ole Suhr?
- >>
- >>Of course I have. And I like it a lot. But I *still* would like the info for
- >>ModPlay.
- >>
- >Well, if you have a Pro, why not use ProMod? I find it to be a little
- >more accurate than ModPlay or Wow (Wow is a little slow on my 386-16 anyways).
- >
- >It's fast, lets you adjust the master,voc,line, and mike inputs (play a
- >mod and sing along...its karaoke!!! ugh)
-
- I agree with you that both ProMod and WOW II are better than ModPlay for
- sound quality and graphics. But, I still use ModPlay over these two
- because of it's mod selection ability. I have nothing against using the
- command line, but MP makes it much easier to find a particular MOD or
- play several.
-