home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!po.CWRU.Edu!dab6
- From: dab6@po.CWRU.Edu (Douglas A. Bell)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
- Subject: Re: THE MOST TASTELESS OS (MSDOS)
- Message-ID: <1992Aug21.151240.17758@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>
- Date: 21 Aug 92 15:12:40 GMT
- References: <1992Aug21.231603.3615@darwin.ntu.edu.au>
- Sender: news@usenet.ins.cwru.edu
- Reply-To: dab6@po.CWRU.Edu (Douglas A. Bell)
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
- Lines: 14
- Nntp-Posting-Host: slc10.ins.cwru.edu
-
-
- In a previous article, nunn@nutmeg.cs.ntu.edu.au (JsNO BAR---NUNN) says:
-
- > - MSDOS has got a pretty bad file management system.
- >
- > On the crispy outside, the MSDOS file system is about the best thing about
- >MSDOS. But as you undo the wrapping, you will discover a sack of shit.
- >For example, Messy maintains to 2 FAT tracks on a given disk. This is the
- >most stupidest thing because if one is corrupted, how the heck do you know
- >which one's correct?.
-
-
- With CRC check.
-