home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #18 / NN_1992_18.iso / spool / comp / sys / ibm / pc / hardware / 22330 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-08-20  |  1.1 KB
  1. Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:22330 comp.periphs:1157
  2. Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.periphs
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!paranjpe
  4. From: paranjpe@leland.Stanford.EDU (Milind D Paranjpe)
  5. Subject: Re: Are Seagate drives any good ?
  6. Message-ID: <1992Aug21.031536.13339@leland.Stanford.EDU>
  7. Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
  8. Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
  9. References: <16rdq3INN38b@seven-up.East.Sun.COM> <1992Aug19.120952.1661@prism.poly.edu> <PHR.92Aug20111227@soda.berkeley.edu>
  10. Date: Fri, 21 Aug 92 03:15:36 GMT
  11. Lines: 11
  12.  
  13. In article <PHR.92Aug20111227@soda.berkeley.edu> phr@soda.berkeley.edu (Paul Rubin) writes:
  14. >Your ST238R is an ST225 selected for being able to handle the RLL density.
  15. >The ST225 was one of the few fairly reliable drives Seagate made,
  16. >from what I understand.  You are pretty lucky with your ST251's,
  17. >which have an awful reputation.
  18.  
  19. I'll second that.  I have had bad experiences with 2 ST251's so far.  But
  20. my ST250R seems to be running just fine.
  21.  
  22. Milind Paranjpe
  23. paranjpe@leland.stanford.edu
  24.