home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.programmer:12459 comp.sys.amiga.hardware:14287
- Path: sparky!uunet!kithrup!hoptoad!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!cbmehq!cbmger!edohwg!heinz
- From: heinz@edohwg.UUCP (Heinz Wrobel)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer,comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: WB 2.0 on A1000
- Message-ID: <heinz.0324@edohwg.UUCP>
- Date: 18 Aug 92 22:05:03 GMT
- References: <salnick.0f8y@dejavu.spk.wa.us> <heinz.02wy@edohwg.UUCP> <1b815ad3.ARN00bf@zoolook.ki.open.de>
- Organization: Edotronik GmbH
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <1b815ad3.ARN00bf@zoolook.ki.open.de> heiko@zoolook.ki.open.de (Heiko Voland) writes:
- >Isn't it better to increase the Kickstart RAM to 512K? Is it possible?
- >I'm very inerested in this question.
-
- Of course it is possible (anything is) but IMHO a lot more messy in terms
- of hardware than to just rip out the RAM board completely. And messy
- hardware usually means instability. Taking out the piggy back reduces the
- number of chips, reduces power needs, and reduces bus load. All of this
- means enhanced reliability IMHO.
-
- >I think it is the best solution for A1000 owners (for me too) when the
- >2.xx Kick can be loaded from disk.
-
- You like fiddling with the KS disk, eh? ;-) :-)
- Seriously, my A1000 at home runs KS2.04 since release and I never missed
- 1.3 a minute. Why would anyone want to switch back? Any reliable
- application runs with 2.04. If not, it's not reliable.
-
- > = Heiko Voland +49-431-526619 heiko@zoolook.ki.open.de _ =
-
- --
- Heinz Wrobel, Edotronik GmbH (ECG018)
- FAX +49 89 850 51 25 / TEL +49 89 850 25 20 (HOME!&VOICE, sometimes...)
- Path: cbmehq!cbmger!edohwg!heinz@cbmvax.commodore.com
- "It's good to have a mouse, it's faster if you can do without one..."
- "He who doesn't develop with an A2024 doesn't know about font independent
- user interfaces..."
-