home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.misc:12873 comp.sys.amiga.tech:54
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!rpi!usc!nic.csu.net!vax.sonoma.edu!nicholas
- From: nicholas@vax.sonoma.edu
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.tech
- Subject: Re: using RAD: drive with extended memory
- Message-ID: <1992Aug19.190643.1@vax.sonoma.edu>
- Date: 19 Aug 92 11:06:43 GMT
- Article-I.D.: vax.1992Aug19.190643.1
- References: <92231.194743TEW105@psuvm.psu.edu> <1992Aug19.015322.19313@cs.mun.ca>
- Organization: Sonoma State University
- Lines: 22
- Nntp-Posting-Host: vax.sonoma.edu
-
- In article <1992Aug19.015322.19313@cs.mun.ca>, thom@cs.mun.ca (Thomas Clancy) writes:
- > <TEW105@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
- >
- >>Ok, I have a GVP Series II 030/22 with 5 megs of ram (1 meg surface,
- >>1 4 meg 32-bit simm) in a 2000 with 2.04. all of the memory on the
- >>board cannot be used as autoconfig (I would have to buy 4 more megs of memory
- >>for that, so I might as well buy a hard drive and then I wouldn't need a
- >>stinking RAD: would I :)
- >>This causes a little problem with the RAD: drive; it doesn't recover (so
- >>whats the point, eh?)
- >
- > Gee, I have the same setup and have NO problem creating a RAD: and having
- > it survive reboot (Though I am under 1.3).
- >
- > Thomas
- >
- When I first bought my 3000 it had an earlier version of the
- os...version 36.something I believe. Anyway RAD: wouldn't survive a
- reboot, so I used 1.3. Now I have a better/newer version of 2.0
- 37.67 and RAD: survives. Which version do you have? Maybe it is
- just older?
- Later Dude, Guy
-