home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!mips!mips!munnari.oz.au!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!monu6!vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au!bull
- From: bull@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: 020 vs 030
- Message-ID: <1992Aug19.170411.89811@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au>
- Date: 19 Aug 92 07:04:11 GMT
- References: <34401@cbmvax.commodore.com> <1992Aug18.205027.912@pro-freedom.cts.com>
- Organization: Computer Centre, Monash University, Australia
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Aug18.205027.912@pro-freedom.cts.com>, eeb@pro-freedom.cts.com (Ed Brown) writes:
- >
- > Another thing about the MMU, IMHO, is that lots of people are buying
- > cheaper accelerators that do not contain a MMU. Are these people gonna be
- > disappointed about the time AmigaDOS v3.0 comes out or what?
- >
-
- Not really. For the most part, the accelerators without an MMU are
- usuing the EC030, which is just a normal 030 with it's MMU disabled. Just
- pull out the EC030 and plug in a normal 030 and you suddenly have your MMU.
- The only people who will have a problem are the ones where the EC030 are
- soldered to the board, and I don't know of any accelerator which has had
- that done to it.
-
- Bull@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au OR bull@monu1.cc.monash.oz
- DOD# 251 '84 VF 750 Closet Ducatisto
- Disclaimer. If you love your llama, let it lambada.
-