home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!unipalm!uknet!mcsun!sunic!aun.uninett.no!nuug!ifi.uio.no!enag
- From: enag@ifi.uio.no (Erik Naggum)
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c
- Subject: Re: preprocessing subterfuge
- Message-ID: <23302I@erik.naggum.no>
- Date: 12 Aug 92 15:13:56 GMT
- References: <1992Aug7.001510.13418@mri.com> <MJN.92Aug9024600@pseudo.uucp> <1992Aug9.144525.4521@taumet.com> <23277A@erik.naggum.no> <_=2m!3_.gurgle@netcom.com> <bjdA_oLX@twinsun.com>
- Organization: Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway
- Lines: 16
-
- Paul Eggert <eggert@twinsun.com> writes:
- |
- | That's not quite what Naggum asked for.
-
- Exactly, and the reason I wouldn't trust any GNU thing about conformance
- to standards is the last sentence in the documentation:
-
- | We recommend, rather, that users take advantage of the
- | extensions of GNU C and disregard the limitations of other
- | compilers.
-
- The effect of this is that people are locked into using free software.
- (Only half a smiley on that one. Flames to /dev/null.)
-
- Best regards,
- </Erik>
- --
- Erik Naggum | ISO 8879 SGML | +47 295 0313
- | ISO 10744 HyTime |
- <erik@naggum.no> | ISO 10646 UCS | Memento, terrigena.
- <enag@ifi.uio.no> | ISO 9899 C | Memento, vita brevis.
-