home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
- Path: sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!geac!zooid!ross
- From: Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org>
- Subject: Re: comp.sources.reviewed and a blast from the past
- Organization: ZOOiD BBS
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 19:03:48 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Aug17.190348.8136@zooid.guild.org>
- References: <1992Aug12.152145.26416@osf.org> <1992Aug14.150535.15169@rick.dgbt.doc.ca> <1992Aug17.023423.14527@virtech.uucp>
- Lines: 27
-
- cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill) writes:
- >My submission went as follows:
- >
- > 11/25 submitted to c.s.r
- ...
- > 3/31 library posted.
-
- >>submitters are serious about their software, we are usually able to
- >>complete a couple of rounds of reviews and get things posted within a
- >>few months.
- >
- >I think that is way too much time and too many reviews. I think the
- >community would be much better served by a much faster and much less
- >nit-picky mechanism that precluded a reviewer from being able to say
- >things like, "I don't like the way he did that".
-
- Sounds like you want comp.sources.misc. But a four month delay
- doesn't sound too bad to me, a package of mine has spent over
- a year on the comp.sources.unix queue.
-
- Ross Ridge
-
- --
- Ross Ridge - The Great HTMU l/ //
- [OO][oo]
- ross@zooid.guild.org /()\/()/
- uunet.ca!zooid!ross db //
-