home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.software-eng
- Path: sparky!uunet!mdisea!brothers
- From: brothers@mdd.comm.mot.com (Joseph Brothers)
- Subject: Re: What is Software Engineering
- Message-ID: <1992Aug20.165848.27962@mdd.comm.mot.com>
- Sender: news@mdd.comm.mot.com
- Organization: Motorola, Mobile Data Division - Seattle, WA
- References: <Bsz991.Knr@cmptrc.lonestar.org> <1992Aug17.013339.27319@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au> <1992Aug19.185601.16876@rtsg.mot.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 16:58:48 GMT
- Lines: 32
-
- Various netpersons wrote:
- >>MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- >>______________________ ____________________
- >> 1. Safety 1. Delivery date
- >> 2. Quality 2. Cost
- >> 3. Cost 3. Use latest "whiz-bang" technique (OO)
- >> 4. Delivery date ...
- >> n. Quality
- >>
- >Here at my company the list is this:
- >
- >SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- >--------------------
- >1. Delivery Date
- >2. Delivery Date
- >3. Delivery Date
- >4. Cost
-
- It took me a while to notice that the one item missing from all these lists is
-
- Effectiveness.
-
- My dictionary defines engineering as "applying scientific knowledge to practical ends".
- It's embarassing to me how often I get caught up in irrelevancies while trying
- to put what I know to work. Hmmm, like posting this when I should be reading old
- grotty code 8-).
-
-
- --
- Joseph L. Brothers
- brothers@mdd.comm.mot.com uunet!mdisea!brothers
- "I am speaking solely for my self, not my employer."
-