home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!news2me.ebay.sun.com!exodus.Eng.Sun.COM!regenmeister!chrisp
- From: chrisp@regenmeister.Sun.COM (Chris Prael)
- Newsgroups: comp.software-eng
- Subject: Re: Terms [Was: What is Software Engineering]
- Date: 14 Aug 1992 16:38:13 GMT
- Organization: Sun Microsystems Inc., Mountain View, CA
- Lines: 30
- Message-ID: <l8noblINN5tv@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>
- References: <1992Aug13.165235.25343@exu.ericsson.se>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: regenmeister
-
- From article <1992Aug13.165235.25343@exu.ericsson.se>, by exujsch@exu.ericsson.se (Johnny Schmittou EXUTEEG x7887 Dallas Texas USA):
- >
- > I always liked the term "computer scientist" over the term "software
- > engineer". If people get computer science degrees (what I received),
- > why not call those people computer scientists? Perhaps when colleges
- > have software engineering degrees (and probably some colleges already
- > have this) a person who earns this degree may be rightfully called
- > a software engineer.
-
- I went through college before there were "computer science" degrees.
- The only fields that felt they needed to tell the rest of the world that
- tey had scientific pretensions were "political science", "social
- science", and "military science" (better known as ROTC).
-
- The next thing that I have observed is that poeple who prefer to be
- called "computer scientist" tend (though not invariably) to perform more
- like technicians than like engineers or scientists. The real problem
- here is in the experience they have (or have not) gained in college.
- Perhaps there is too much memorization of minor techniques and not
- enough learning of principles.
-
- In the rest of the technical world, scientists try to figure out why the
- latest thing the engineers built works, engineers build products, and
- technicians handle the scut work.
-
- The label programmer covers all three quite well.
-
- Just another two cents
-
- Chris Prael
-