home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!torn!cunews!nrcnet0!cu23.crl.aecl.ca!wl.aecl.ca!jeremiahw
- From: jeremiahw@wl.aecl.ca
- Newsgroups: comp.robotics
- Subject: RE: balancing_act
- Message-ID: <17AUG92.16111419@wl.aecl.ca>
- Date: 17 Aug 92 22:11:14 GMT
- References: <1992Aug14.181900.26605@ee.ubc.ca> <1992Aug14.193217.17073@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu> <1992Aug15.043443.25054@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <1992Aug16.214515.4493@microsoft.com> <1992Aug17.181107.25084@sctc.com>
- Sender: news@cu23.crl.aecl.ca (USENET News System)
- Organization: AECL RESEARCH
- Lines: 7
- Nntp-Posting-Host: wc4.wl.aecl.ca
-
- >If you're not vertical, how can you determine a vertical line?
-
- I thin he meant that you find lines and assume they are vertical.
- Then you know which way is up. If you watch the gradient you
- should be able to make that assumption with reasonable accuracy.
-
- >>Jerry
-