home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!decuac!hussar.dco.dec.com!mjr
- From: mjr@hussar.dco.dec.com (Marcus J. Ranum)
- Subject: Re: NFS corruption discovery
- Message-ID: <1992Aug21.020212.10792@decuac.dec.com>
- Sender: news@decuac.dec.com (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hussar.dco.dec.com
- Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation, Washington ULTRIX Resource Center
- References: <1992Aug19.225010.18306@den.mmc.com> <1992Aug20.172636.2169@den.mmc.com> <oquirck@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 02:02:12 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (Vernon Schryver) writes:
-
- >People who prudently turn on UDP checksums will not (I hope) see data
- >corruption, but if whatever is corrupting data is present, they
- >will see NFS retransmissions.
-
- To amplify on this:
-
- People who turn on UDP checksumming (if they are so unfortunate
- as to have bought a deliberately broken operating system) and notice
- lots of bad checksums, should note that they have some kind of network
- problem, and should assume that they are suffering some kind of impact,
- performance-wise.
-
- mjr.
-