home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!bcm!lib!oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu!jmaynard
- From: jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: Win NT support in OS/2
- Message-ID: <7154@lib.tmc.edu>
- Date: 20 Aug 1992 14:06:33 GMT
- References: <1992Aug12.171206.305@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Aug12.224740.2776@cs.brown.edu> <gnash.714266561@ee.uts.EDU.AU>
- Sender: usenet@lib.tmc.edu
- Organization: UT Health Science Center Houston
- Lines: 12
- Nntp-Posting-Host: oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu
-
- In article <gnash.714266561@ee.uts.EDU.AU> gnash@ee.uts.edu.au (Greg Nash) writes:
- >It's more like trying to run X clients and servers on top of DOS, with
- >full multi-tasking. I am aware Desqview does something LIKE that, but
- >why isn't everyone using it?
-
- Because Quarterdeck took a year too long to get DESQview/X out. They appear,
- at least from where I sit, to have missed their window of opportunity (no pun
- intended). DV/X is a killer system, but OS/2 is even better.
- --
- Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can
- jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu | adequately be explained by stupidity.
- "Anything that an F-4 can outturn is not maneuverable." -- Mary Shafer
-