home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!cam-orl!root
- From: thg@cam-orl.co.uk (Tim Glauert)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: OS/2 Needs a Supervisor mode!
- Message-ID: <1992Aug18.103538.15477@cam-orl.co.uk>
- Date: 18 Aug 92 10:35:38 GMT
- References: <1992Aug14.031238.18568@msi.com> <1992Aug15.011002.25592@microsoft.com> <1992Aug15.230755.14630@chpc.utexas.edu> <1992Aug16.001819.14010@unixg.ubc.ca> <mcdonald.211@aries.scs.uiuc.edu>
- Sender: root@cam-orl.co.uk (Operator)
- Followup-To: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Organization: Olivetti Research Ltd, Cambridge, England.
- Lines: 12
-
- In article <mcdonald.211@aries.scs.uiuc.edu>, mcdonald@aries.scs.uiuc.edu (J. D. McDonald) writes:
- |> In article <1992Aug16.001819.14010@unixg.ubc.ca> ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca (ochealth) writes:
- |> >some people have complained about OS/2 not having multiuser capabilities
- |>
- |> You want Unix, or, even better, VMS or an IBM or Unisys mainframe operating
- |> system.
-
- Or VMS++, which is Windows NT :-)
-
- |> You know where to find them.
-
- ... but you'll have to wait 6 months or so for NT proper.
-