home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!cpqhou!thomasr
- From: thomasr@cpqhou.compaq.com (Thomas Rush)
- Subject: Re: Impressions of Windows NT
- Reply-To: thomasr@cpqhou.UUCP (Thomas Rush)
- Organization: Compaq Computer Corporation
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 92 12:54:16 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Aug12.125416.7986@cpqhou.compaq.com>
- Keywords: R4000
- References: <9207281653.AA18391@enet-gw.pa.dec.com> <1992Aug5.062335.1327@odin.corp.sgi.com> <1992Aug6.071330.10059@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz> <7AUG199221292854@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu>
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <7AUG199221292854@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu> cvadrtbc@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu (Srikanth Viswanathan) writes:
- >In article <1992Aug6.071330.10059@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz>, stuartw@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz (Stuart Woolford) writes...
- >>
- >>not really, the advantage of 64bit is computational, and has very little to do
- >>with the os ( or do you really think you will nead over 4G memory?? )
- >
- >Gee, I think it was Bill Gates who said "640K should be enough for
- >anybody".
-
- Or even better yet, Peter Norton in the "New, Revised" edition of
- _Inside_the_IBM_PC_ (Second edition?), commenting on the new IBM AT
- and its RAM said, basically, "The AT comes with 256K of RAM, which
- will be more than enough for all but a few specialized applications."
-
-
-
- thomas rush uunet!cpqhou!thomasr
- compaq computer corporation their employee,
- deep in the hearth of texas not their opinions.
-