home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.apps:5448 comp.os.os2.misc:27901
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!mig
- From: mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Meir I Green)
- Subject: Re: Why new COM drivers?
- Message-ID: <1992Aug21.035108.14934@news.columbia.edu>
- Sender: usenet@news.columbia.edu (The Network News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
- Reply-To: mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Meir I Green)
- Organization: Columbia University, New York
- References: <1992Aug20.001811.1002@ultb.isc.rit.edu> <1992Aug20.111605.9739@actrix.gen.nz>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 03:51:08 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Aug20.111605.9739@actrix.gen.nz> Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz writes:
- >In article <1992Aug20.001811.1002@ultb.isc.rit.edu> djs6015@ultb.isc.rit.edu (Don Smith) writes:
- >
- >At the OS/2 seminar I attended at IBM this evening, the presenter stresses
- >that if your system isn't broken - DON'T FIX IT. The only exception was the
- >kernel patch, which everyone using OS/2 should apply (the June 17th patch,
- >that is).
-
- Really? Well, I suppose I am not such an expert as he...but I had problems
- with out of memory errors with the new kernel, and no problems with the
- original. Furthermore, I think that the new COM drivers provide important
- added funcitonality, and possibly increase performance. I am using the new
- ones now, without incident.
- * * * * * =================== Internet address is mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
- * * * * * * == Meir I. Green == Amateur Packet Radio N2JPG@W2XO.PA.USA.NOAM
- * * * * * = mig@columbia.edu= Amateur Packet Radio N2JPG@K2KJC.NY.USA.NOAM
- * * * * * * =================== Amateur TCP/IP N2JPG@uhm.ampr.org /EX
-