home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!microsoft!wingnut!petesk
- From: petesk@microsoft.com (Pete Skelly)
- Subject: Re: MS Gave Up (Was Re: pc week and nt)
- Message-ID: <1992Aug20.013406.22269@microsoft.com>
- Date: 20 Aug 92 01:34:06 GMT
- Organization: Microsoft Corporation
- References: <~1@byu.edu> <1992Aug14.195641.5478@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> <1992Aug18.131240.15526@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <1992Aug18.131240.15526@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> dab6@po.CWRU.Edu (Douglas A. Bell) writes:
- >
- >In a previous article, petesk@microsoft.com (Pete Skelly) says:
- >
- >>In article <1992Aug14.195641.5478@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> dab6@po.CWRU.Edu (Douglas A. Bell) writes:
- >>>
- >>>Pete,
- >>>
- >>>God damn it, Microsoft never put up a fight to keep OS/2. They just tried
- ><rant deleted>
- >
- >
- >>Ahhh, excuse me, were you there. Were you in any of the meetings about
- >>the settlement, or the handing of OS/2 over to IBM.
- >
- >So what actually did happen?
-
- Would you believe me if I told you? ;)
-
- Let's just say it was an unfortunate disagreement
- in which both sides were responsable, but it was
- more the situation.
-
- petesk@microsoft.com
- My Opinions...
-
-
-