home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!spcvxb.spc.edu!terry
- From: terry@spcvxb.spc.edu (Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr.)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
- Subject: Re: Is Tseng Lab ET4000 an Windows accelerator chip ?
- Message-ID: <1992Aug20.002048.3652@spcvxb.spc.edu>
- Date: 20 Aug 92 04:20:48 GMT
- References: <1992Aug19.212056.4792@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- Organization: St. Peter's College, US
- Lines: 39
-
- In article <1992Aug19.212056.4792@ecst.csuchico.edu>, csyew@ecst.csuchico.edu (YewSim Cheah) writes:
- > I have bought a FastData PowerWin VGA card from FastMicro Direct
- > Express. The card features an ET4000 chip and a RAMDAC HIColor
- > chip. FastMicro (Phoenix, AZ) claims ET4000 is an accelerator
- > chip and will run Windows 6 times faster. But when I install it
- > into my 386SX-16Mhz computer with the correct Windows' turbo driver,
- > it doesn't seem faster than my old Video 7 (256K). It is even
- > slower without using the turbo driver.
-
- The ET4000 is not a "windows accelerator". It's a rather fast bitmap
- controller chip. True accelerators implement some of the Windows oper-
- ations in the controller, rather than by having the driver move the
- data "by hand". Some of the more common operations are scrolling, block
- copy (bitblt), etc.
-
- While the ET4000 does allow simple bitblt's, I don't know of any Win
- driver that takes advantage of this.
-
- An accelerator can be lots faster for some operations (as noted, the
- scroll and windows drag are some of the most improved). The "S3" is a
- common accelerator. However, it's amazingly difficult to get an S3 to
- manage more than 256 colors in modes beyond 640x480. The ET4000 when
- equipped with the maximum of 2Mb of display memory can do 24-bit color
- at lower resolutions (800x600, and _slow_) or it can do 64K colors at
- 1024x768 without a RAMDAC/HIcolor DAC, but using a "normal" 5/5/6 DAC.
- Of course, that makes it sufficiently different from "normal" VGA that
- it would need VGA pass-through for regular use, and would be slow enough
- that it would probably lose out in the marketplace. There are also other
- accelerators which are more costly than the S3, ranging from other sin-
- gle-chip units through TI TMS32xxx subsystems.
-
- The whole point of putting the processing power on the card is because
- the bandwidth between the 80X86 and the video is slow. Local bus video
- may reverse this trend. I've seen a number of high-end RISC boxes with
- "dumb frame buffers" that substantially out-perform video coprocessors.
-
- Terry Kennedy Operations Manager, Academic Computing
- terry@spcvxa.bitnet St. Peter's College, Jersey City, NJ USA
- terry@spcvxa.spc.edu +1 201 915 9381
-