home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.msdos.misc:4753 comp.os.ms-windows.misc:2086
- Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!torn!csd.unb.ca!morgan.ucs.mun.ca!nano.engr.mun.ca!sauron
- From: sauron@nano.engr.mun.ca (Patrick Ryan)
- Subject: Re: Why DOS 5.0 for Windows 3.1 ???
- Message-ID: <sauron.713912919@femto.engr.mun.ca>
- Sender: usenet@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (NNTP server account)
- Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland
- References: <80082@bcsaic.boeing.com> <1992Aug14.175049.1691@rei.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 21:08:39 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- fox@rei.com (Fuzzy Fox) writes:
-
- >milan@bcsaic.boeing.com (Milan Richter) writes:
-
- >Under a DOS 5 shell from Windows 3.1 you can have as much as 600K free,
- >with the proper setup.
-
- If your use something like QEMM with it as well, the savings go a bit
- higher. I can get 610464 bytes of memory free, and that's with
- soundcard drivers, mouse driver, ANSI... I'm impressed.
-
- --
- ,---, ,---, ,-----, / Of course I said it! Do you / sauron@ / o o
- / / / / / / think MUN even acknowledges / femto. / v
- /---` /---/ / / my existence, let alone allow / mun.ca / `-'
- / / / / / me to speak for them?/chris@zeus rented this space
-