home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!crdgw1!rdsunx.crd.ge.com!ariel!davidsen
- From: davidsen@ariel.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: Stabilizing linux
- Message-ID: <1992Aug14.133217.23937@crd.ge.com>
- Date: 14 Aug 92 13:32:17 GMT
- References: <1992Aug13.200750.1247@athena.mit.edu>
- Sender: usenet@crd.ge.com (Required for NNTP)
- Reply-To: davidsen@crd.ge.com (bill davidsen)
- Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center, Schenectady NY
- Lines: 26
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ariel.crd.ge.com
-
- In article <1992Aug13.200750.1247@athena.mit.edu>, komarimf@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Mark Komarinski) writes:
-
- | Why not have both? Whipping up some on-line manuals that can be printed
- | or viewed should not be that much trouble, and everyone will benefit in the
- | end.
-
- I think you should be the one to do it, then. I've written 40-50 page
- user manuals, and many programs of that size, and I can tell you that a
- quality manual takes about 2x longer, per page, than code. That insuring
- that the notation is consistent end to end, the style is uniform (chatty
- or dry, but consistent), that every fact is correct, exceptions are
- noted (this works with 0.96a and 0.96b, but not later versions), and
- that there are clear examples for all sections which a user could
- possibly misunderstand.
-
- My recent experience with asking for the location of docs rather than
- useful hints was revealing; on two questions I got a total of 31 answers
- (Linux people are the nicest on the net!), but I got 30 "I don't have
- docs, but this worked for me," and one "thaere's a doc on tsx... but
- it's not very clear, this is what I think it means." So I now have a few
- more lines of notes in my KWS notes file, but no new docs.
-
- This could really be a huge job, you've been warned.
- --
- bill davidsen, GE Corp. R&D Center; Box 8; Schenectady NY 12345
- I admit that when I was in school I wrote COBOL. But I didn't compile.
-