home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.coherent:3722 comp.bbs.waffle:1821
- Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent,comp.bbs.waffle
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uchinews!iitmax!pred
- From: pred@iitmax.iit.edu (Predrag S. Bundalo)
- Subject: Re: Waffle vs. UUCP/rn on Coherent?
- Message-ID: <1992Aug15.204922.28921@iitmax.iit.edu>
- Organization: Illinois Institute of Technology
- References: <SJE.92Aug13150300@xylos.ma30.bull.com> <BLwHPB4w165w@mantis.co.uk> <SJE.92Aug14135749@xylos.ma30.bull.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Aug 92 20:49:22 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <SJE.92Aug14135749@xylos.ma30.bull.com> sje@xylos.ma30.bull.com writes:
- >In article <BLwHPB4w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew) writes:
- [Discussion on MINIX vs COHERENT deleted.]
-
- >Coherent is a better deal for those whose interest is in research
- >application development with a multiprocessing environment; a
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- >developer can spend less time diddling with the OS and more time
- >solving real problems.
-
- [I know this is totally unrelated to the current thread, BUT. . .]
-
- I sure wish you'd use "multitasking, multiuser" instead of multiprocessing.
- Because most people consider a multiprocessing environment "an environment
- with multiple processors," using that term--although I know you mean
- multiple processes--will confuse and mislead most people who are
- unfamiliar with COHERENT.
-
- Regards,
-
- Pred Bundalo
-
- Note: This is in no way a flame. Just a suggestion.
- --
- ::: Predrag S. Bundalo Academic Computing Center :::
- ::: Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago, Illinois :::
- ..........................................................................
- ::: Internet: pred@{iitmax, elof}.iit.edu, syspredrag@minna.iit.edu :::
- ::: BITNET : syspredrag@iitvax.BITNET :::
-