home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.multimedia
- Path: sparky!uunet!email!eichow.tuwien.ac.at!MARTIN
- From: martin@eichow.tuwien.ac.at (Martin Schoenhacker)
- Subject: Re: SoundBlaster sampling frequency accuracy
- Message-ID: <1992Aug21.113836.20589@email.tuwien.ac.at>
- Sender: news@email.tuwien.ac.at
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eichow.tuwien.ac.at
- Reply-To: martin@eichow.tuwien.ac.at
- Organization: Tech. University Vienna, Dept. of Computergraphic
- References: <1992Aug20.084909.5385@kth.se>,<172af8INNllp@ensta.ensta.fr>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 11:38:36 GMT
- Lines: 65
-
- Gilles recently brought the following to us:
-
- >In article <1992Aug20.084909.5385@kth.se> pesjogre@nada.kth.se (Peter Sj{gren) writes:
- >>Hi,
- >>
- >(... DELETED ...)
- >>
- >>I therefore wonder about the accuracy of the sampling frequency and other
- >>data on this model (1.5) and if they are better on later versions.
- >>
- > Ah, I suggest you read the programmers manual of the Sound Blaster...
- >I don't have it at work with me, but you'll notice that the sampling
- >frequency is stored in a specific format... Just count the bits, and you'll
- >get the acuracy with which the sampling frequency is defined... That should
- >help you...
- >
- > As an example, say you're using 8 bits to define a frequency... And
- >Your Frequence can go from 0 to 22000 Hz... Then you have a 86 Hz acuracy.
- >At 11000 KHz, it's 43 Hz... And so on... 440 Hz give 2 Hz accuracy.
- >
- > Does this help?
-
- No, sorry, it doesn't. There seems to be a misunderstanding here, so let me
- have a go on getting this straight ...
-
- The sampling frequency (e.g. 11000 Hz [not KHz as in your post]) defines how
- often the sound card will sample its input channel, acquiring an 8-bit sample
- (i.e. for the standard Soundblaster models). This sample corresponds to the
- signal level on the input line, NOT to a frequency.
-
- If someone uses this mechanism to record a 440 Hz tone, the sound card samples
- a waveform which eventually should turn out to contain 440 full sinusoidal (or
- the like) waves per second. Please note there was no need to talk about a
- specific sampling frequency until now.
-
- If the sample get replayed (or edited), the input sampling frequency becomes
- important, since it will tell you how many of the sampled values should be
- reproduced to the sound card speaker in unit time. And if that goes wrong,
- i.e. more or less samples are being replayed per second than have been
- recorded, there is a frequency shift between input and output signals.
-
- For example, if a 440 Hz tone has been recorded at a sampling frequency of
- 11000 Hz, but is being replayed at an output sample frequency of just
- 10900 Hz, then the tone you hear will just contain 436 cycles per second,
- i.e. 436 Hz.
-
- So the problem is not one of using 8 bits, as in your example, to represent
- the 440 Hz out of 22 kHz one might want to record, which would give a 86 Hz
- inaccuracy and render the sound card unusable. Rather, it is one of getting
- the input and output sampling frequencies to be the same.
-
- Sorry I can't answer the original question about this phenomenon, but I hope
- to have clarified what the question was about at all.
-
- All the best,
-
- Martin
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
- | Martin Schoenhacker | Lagerhausstrasse 19, A-3580 Horn, Austria |
- |-------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
- | A U S T R I A -- | E-Mail: schoenhacker@eichow.tuwien.ac.at |
- | In the very Heart of | Phone: +43 (1) 58801 / 4117 |
- | E U R O P E | Fax: +43 (1) 504 25 83 |
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-